10 Things CGAP Got Right or Wrong about Financial Access

> Posted by Elisabeth Rhyne, Managing Director, CFI

The following post was originally published on the CGAP Microfinance Blog.

The Center for Financial Inclusion’s project, Financial Inclusion 2020 is attempting to make predictions about the future of access to finance for the world’s low income people. So I was delighted to discover in a stack of old papers a CGAP Focus Note containing a rich set of predictions for the future of microfinance – from 2006. These predictions were contained in several sets of scenarios that examined possible futures for financial inclusion. For each topic, CGAP envisioned an optimistic scenario and a pessimistic one.

With six years gone by, it is possible to look back and see how the scenarios have fared. Acknowledging that in 2006 both the global financial crisis and the iPhone were in the future, CGAP did pretty well – both in anticipating important positive changes and warning about possible negative ones. Here are my comments on 10 of the predictions drawn from either the optimistic or pessimistic scenarios put forth.

1. Hundreds of millions of poor and unbanked clients gain access to cell phones. Absolutely. If anything, this prediction was too timid. At that time, CGAP foresaw much of the new access through shared phones, and they did not yet imagine the power and accessibility of smart phones.

2. Governments opt to make social transfer payments to poor citizens through banks and other financial institutions, using electronic payments and wireless technology. Increasingly true, as CGAP documented in a 2009 Focus Note. The recently launched Better than Cash Alliance is now turning these many scattered efforts into a global movement.

3. Regulators amend regulations that limit banking transactions to conventional bank branches, allowing other infrastructure to do double duty as virtual branches. Much success; in many countries. Many regulations have been passed to facilitate agent banking and mobile banking. However, in a number of countries, new regulations start but do not go far enough to fully enable branchless banking.

4. Governments work together with banks to develop common financial architectures like interoperable ATMs and POS machines and cell phone-based transaction networks. If only that were the case. Even though governments increasingly recognize interoperability as a priority, and in some places are working with regulators to find common solutions, broad interoperability remains elusive.

5. Countries like Sudan and Zambia…remain on the fringes of the wireless revolution. Surprise! The wireless revolution has clearly impacted all countries, including those torn apart by war and disaster like Haiti, Sudan, and Afghanistan. Mobile money is moving forward fast in countries that have had few alternatives in the past. Earlier this year, Accion and Omidyar invested in a Zambian mobile money company, one of the rising stars in the region.

6. The high fixed costs of technology infrastructure allow large banks to push out small players. Not really. This was a prediction from the negative scenario, but things are turning out to be more aligned with the positive scenario. Increasingly, the “rails” of technology infrastructure are seen as enablers for smaller players to experiment or offer highly tailored services. The number of new starts with innovative business models that use technology is burgeoning.

To read the rest of the post, visit the CGAP Microfinance Blog.

For more information about the Financial Inclusion 2020 campaign, sign up for email updates. 

Image credit: CGAP

Have you read? 

Seven Trends to Watch in the March to Achieve Full Financial Inclusion for All

35 Central Banks Commit to Financial Inclusion

Tech Jobs for Women and Youth in Kenya

Join the Conversation

Stay informed. Subscribe to our newsletter.